Mirror 2: Project X
Mirror 2: Project X screenshot 1Mirror 2: Project X screenshot 2
AdventureIndieRPG3DMatch 3AnimeFemale ProtagonistVisual Novel

Playing nowFewer than 10

Peak in the last 24 hours: 12

Peak in the last 7 days: 12

Mirror 2: Project X Early Access Steam store

Game description

Enter the parallel worlds enriched by the stories and match-3 games developed using cel-shading techniques powered by Unreal Engine 4. Ponder on your choices because each of them will determine the fate of all.

Basic info

DeveloperKAGAMI Ⅱ WORKs
PublisherNIJICO
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckUnsupported
Release dateJan 20, 2022
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10
ProcessorIntel Core i5-3570K or AMD FX-8310
Memory8 GB
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
Storage10 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 86 reviews from the past 1 year

29.5/ 100
Bottom 1%

Steam rating: Mostly Negative (24%)

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 23, 2026)

Match-3 puzzles meet fully voiced 3D characters in this sequel, and Mirror 2: Project X scores 29.5 from 86 analyzed reviews.

👍 Strengths

21 reviews praise the visuals, and some say the models and animation go well beyond its low price. Visuals & Sound ranks 830th of 1249. 11 enjoy the story, and a few say they play for its plot and voice acting. 9 find it fun, and some say the puzzles turned out better than they expected and are worth picking up on sale.

👎 Where it falls short

21 reviews feel they did not get their money's worth, and some say they bought it expecting the adult content of the first game, which this sequel does not have. Pricing & Fairness ranks 1346th of 1399. 13 are let down by the story, and a few call the characters thin or say it drops the main element of the first game. 8 criticize developer support, and some say promised content never arrived and the project was left unfinished. Tech & Support ranks 1368th of 1399, Content Volume ranks 1347th of 1351, and Gameplay ranks 1388th of 1396.

Representative reviews Original reviews ↗

“predatory monetization and false advertising disguised as game content” · 21 reviews
“game is well-made and cheap” · 21 reviews
“sequel lacks main element of first game, misleading direction” · 13 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 14% of reviews · Bottom 1% of the games we've analyzed

Strategy -2.56 · Depth of builds, tactics, and meaningful choices
Negative “distinct lack of choice, most choices change nothing” · 1 review
Positive “tower climbing adds some innovative mechanics” · 1 review

Progression 6% · Difficulty 1% · Onboarding 7% · Freedom 2% · Controls & feel 5%

Plot, characters and the world
Mentioned in 40% of reviews · Bottom 5% of the games we've analyzed

Story -1.36 · Plot, quests, writing, and the ending
Negative “sequel lacks main element of first game, misleading direction” · 13 reviews
Positive “interesting story and pleasant 3D graphics, game worth purchasing” · 11 reviews

Characters 12% · World 1%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 35% of reviews · Bottom 1% of the games we've analyzed

Volume -2.68 · How much there is to play, including endgame, for the price
Negative “bare textures, no sexual content yet despite being main draw” · 7 reviews

Variety 5% · Replayability 6%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 27% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals +2.41 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Positive “game is well-made and cheap” · 21 reviews

Audio 3%

Playing with others, the community and servers
Mentioned in 10% of reviews · Bottom 1% of the games we've analyzed

Community -3.35 · Who you play with — how many, and how friendly

Playing together 1% · Servers & Connection 0%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 51% of reviews · Bottom 5% of the games we've analyzed

Pricing -1.61 · Whether the price, DLC and microtransactions are reasonable, and how much paying gives you an edge
Negative “predatory monetization and false advertising disguised as game content” · 21 reviews
Positive “cheap enough to not regret, early access warning noted” · 6 reviews

Anti-cheat 0% · Balance 3% · Matchmaking 0%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 46% of reviews · Bottom 5% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support -1.65 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Negative “developers abandoned promised features and misled players about project cancellation” · 8 reviews

Stability 5% · Performance 3%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.