PROJECT: PLAYTIME ▶ Trailer
PROJECT: PLAYTIME screenshot 1PROJECT: PLAYTIME screenshot 2
ActionIndieFree To PlayMultiplayerHorrorSurvival HorrorOnline Co-OpPuzzle

38 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 114

Peak in the last 7 days: 125

PROJECT: PLAYTIME Early Access Steam store

Game description

PROJECT: PLAYTIME is a Free-to-Play multiplayer horror game where six players attempt to create one giant toy while surviving a terrifying monster that roams the toy factory. A seventh player controls the monster and is given only one goal: Find and kill everyone.

Basic info

DeveloperMob Entertainment
PublisherMob Entertainment
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckPlayable
Release dateDec 12, 2022
Price

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10
ProcessorIntel Core i5
Memory8 GB
GraphicsNvidia GeForce GTX 1050 / Radeon RX 580
Storage20 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 387 reviews from the past 1 year

72.9/ 100
Bottom 30%

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 22, 2026)

Once a lively co-op horror game about building giant toys while a monster hunts the team, PROJECT: PLAYTIME now scores 72.9.

👍 Strengths

43 reviews remember playing with friends as the highlight, solving puzzles together while genuinely scared, and a few say it led to lasting friendships. 14 enjoy the frightening atmosphere, with sudden jump scares and tense escape scenes. Story & World ranks 614th of 1096. Some still call it fun and say the idea has real potential.

👎 Where it falls short

Tech & Support appears in 69% of analyzed reviews and ranks 1393rd of 1399. 163 reviews say the developers abandoned the game, with no steady updates for a long time, and some describe removed features and closed community channels. 36 report bugs and crashes, and a few lost their save progress. 23 describe poor performance, with stutters and freezes even on low settings. Multiplayer ranks 506th of 642 and Pricing & Fairness ranks 1072nd of 1399, and some regret money spent on a game that stopped growing.

“abandoned game, removed discord channels, CEO gave no honest statement” · 163 reviews
“graphismes exceptionnel pour un jeu de ce type” · 16 reviews
“game lost its unique mechanics and became simple chase gameplay where player cannot win” · 16 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 18% of reviews · Bottom 30% of the games we've analyzed

Strategy +2.30 · Depth of builds, tactics, and meaningful choices
Positive “good mechanics and entertaining” · 7 reviews
Negative “невозможно играть за монстра, нет актива en el juego” · 1 review

Progression 5% · Difficulty 3% · Onboarding 3% · Freedom 2% · Controls & feel 4%

Plot, characters and the world
Mentioned in 10% of reviews · Bottom 50% of the games we've analyzed

World +2.91 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is
Positive “fun and frightening really cool” · 14 reviews

Story 2% · Characters 1%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 14% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Variety -2.30 · Fresh content and situations versus repetition
Negative “same 3 monsters since launch, zero new content added” · 5 reviews

Volume 11% · Replayability 1%

Graphics, art style, music and sound

Not enough data — only 7% of reviews mention this.

Visuals +2.60 · Graphics, art style, and animation

Audio 2%

Playing with others, the community and servers
Mentioned in 46% of reviews · Bottom 30% of the games we've analyzed

Community -2.83 · Who you play with — how many, and how friendly
Negative “low player count limits multiplayer enjoyment” · 19 reviews
Positive “community is not toxic and welcoming” · 1 review

Playing together 27% · Servers & Connection 7%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 24% of reviews · Bottom 30% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -0.30 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “game lost its unique mechanics and became simple chase gameplay where player cannot win” · 16 reviews

Anti-cheat 1% · Pricing 11% · Matchmaking 7%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 69% of reviews · Bottom 1% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support -2.03 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Negative “abandoned game, removed discord channels, CEO gave no honest statement” · 163 reviews

Stability 20% · Performance 11%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.