REMATCH ▶ Trailer
REMATCH screenshot 1REMATCH screenshot 2
ActionIndieSportsFootball (Soccer)MultiplayerPvPeSportsOnline Co-Op

1,470 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 6,841

Peak in the last 7 days: 7,645

REMATCH Steam store

Game description

Control one player in fast-paced online football matches from an immersive third-person perspective. Team up with friends in teams of 3, 4 or 5, show off your skills, and make every move count.

Basic info

DeveloperSloclap
PublisherSloclap, Kepler Interactive
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckPlayable
Release dateJun 19, 2025
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10 / Windows 11
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 5 3400G / Intel Core i5-9400, or better
Memory8 GB
GraphicsAMD Radeon RX 5500 (4GB) / NVIDIA GeForce RTX 1060 (4GB), or better
Storage20 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 392 reviews from the past 1 year

63.9/ 100
Bottom 20%

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 13, 2026)

Toxic teammates and lag dominate the complaints about REMATCH, a football game players say has real potential; it scores 63.9.

👍 Strengths

111 reviews say they enjoy it and that it has potential. 14 praise its tactics and mechanics, and 11 say it plays and feels great. Players also like the art style and arenas. Players who stay describe a solid core concept that could shine with fixes, and Gameplay comes up in 35% of analyzed reviews.

👎 Where it falls short

Multiplayer ranks 573rd of 642 and comes up in 74% of analyzed reviews. 51 reviews describe players throwing and griefing without punishment, and 50 say fixes and communication are slow. 47 complain about ranked matches, saying teammates can leave freely while everyone loses points. Tech & Support ranks 1294th of 1399, with reports of lag, teleporting and inconsistent hitboxes. Pricing & Fairness ranks 1333rd of 1399 and Content Volume 1300th of 1351. Others say the ball passes through players and that collision bugs break core mechanics.

“game itself is good, potential exists” · 111 reviews
“teammates leave ranked freely, all players lose points unfairly” · 47 reviews
“interesting mechanics and solid core gameplay concept” · 14 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 35% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Strategy +0.99 · Depth of builds, tactics, and meaningful choices
Positive “interesting mechanics and solid core gameplay concept” · 14 reviews
Negative “glitches like flicker/180 animation cancels limit skill ceiling and look bad” · 2 reviews

Progression 4% · Difficulty 2% · Onboarding 9% · Freedom 2% · Controls & feel 20%

Plot, characters and the world

Not enough data — only 1% of reviews mention this.

World +3.00 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is

Story 0% · Characters 0%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 12% of reviews · Bottom 5% of the games we've analyzed

Variety -3.06 · Fresh content and situations versus repetition
Negative “lack of variety makes experience feel repetitive over time” · 1 review

Volume 9% · Replayability 1%

Graphics, art style, music and sound

Not enough data — only 9% of reviews mention this.

Visuals +2.20 · Graphics, art style, and animation

Audio 3%

Playing with others, the community and servers
Mentioned in 74% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Community -2.89 · Who you play with — how many, and how friendly
Negative “toxic players throwing and griefing without punishment” · 51 reviews
Positive “friendly players, everyone passes and behaves respectfully” · 2 reviews

Playing together 51% · Servers & Connection 23%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 52% of reviews · Bottom 5% of the games we've analyzed

Matchmaking -0.82 · Skill gaps, team balance, and queue times
Negative “teammates leave ranked freely, all players lose points unfairly” · 47 reviews

Anti-cheat 1% · Pricing 28% · Balance 24%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 48% of reviews · Bottom 10% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support -0.80 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Negative “slow or non-existent meta fixes and dev communication” · 50 reviews
Positive “developers putting a lot of work on the game” · 2 reviews

Stability 26% · Performance 4%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.