Feed the Cups ▶ Trailer
Feed the Cups screenshot 1Feed the Cups screenshot 2
CasualIndieSimulationCuteCookingOnline Co-OpCraftingLocal Co-Op

1,866 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 3,760

Feed the Cups Steam store

Game description

Feed the Cups is a Roguelite multiplayer online cooperative game. Run a Drink Shop, stocking up, preparing ingredients, taking orders, crafting drinks, cleaning up, and checking equipment. Join your friends together!

Basic info

DeveloperVambear Games
PublisherIndieArk
PlatformsWindows · macOS
Steam DeckPlayable
Release dateOct 15, 2026
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows 7+
Processor2 Ghz
Memory4 GB
Graphics128MB, OpenGL 3+
Storage1 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 393 reviews from the past 1 year

63.1/ 100
Bottom 20%

Steam rating: Mostly Positive (70%)

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 31, 2026)

Running a busy restaurant with friends is the hook in Feed the Cups, but connection trouble weighs on a score of 63.1.

👍 Strengths

109 reviews find it fun, and the most upvoted says it is fun to play with family and stressful in an enjoyable way. 39 enjoy playing together, with the most upvoted calling the shared management orderly and fulfilling. 14 say there is plenty of content, and some mention long playtimes across solo and multiplayer. Content Volume ranks 523rd of 1351.

👎 Where it falls short

Multiplayer appears in 54% of analyzed reviews and ranks 571st of 642. 94 reviews describe unstable online connection, with some dropping out several times an evening even on the same network. 28 find the difficulty too hard, and some point to an unfair spike in later chapters and a lowest setting that still overwhelms. 28 report bugs, including corrupted saves that block the game from starting. A few also say solo play uses the same difficulty as multiplayer. Tech & Support ranks 1215th of 1399, and Gameplay ranks 1126th of 1396.

Representative reviews Original reviews ↗

“fun to play with family, stressful in an enjoyable way” · 109 reviews
“multiplayer connection breaks at distance, unplayable netcode” · 94 reviews
“400+ hours with full achievements, balanced difficulty, solo and multiplayer” · 14 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 46% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Controls & feel -2.23 · Responsiveness, precision, and how the menus handle
Negative “clunky mechanics like food prep and snowshoveling designed poorly” · 14 reviews
Positive “good gameplay mechanics and art style with successful difficulty balance” · 4 reviews

Progression 16% · Difficulty 21% · Onboarding 7% · Freedom 2% · Strategy 9%

Plot, characters and the world

Not enough data — only 7% of reviews mention this.

World +2.20 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is

Story 1% · Characters 3%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 18% of reviews · Top 40% of the games we've analyzed

Volume +1.14 · How much there is to play, including endgame, for the price
Positive “400+ hours with full achievements, balanced difficulty, solo and multiplayer” · 14 reviews
Negative “game ends abruptly and becomes boring” · 4 reviews

Variety 9% · Replayability 4%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 12% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals +1.22 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Positive “art style and character skills appealing, better gameplay than Overcooked” · 13 reviews
Negative “art style is ugly, game not fun, content sparse and overpriced” · 9 reviews

Audio 2%

Playing with others, the community and servers
Mentioned in 54% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Servers & Connection -1.16 · Server stability, ping, and disconnects
Negative “multiplayer connection breaks at distance, unplayable netcode” · 94 reviews

Playing together 40% · Community 7%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 13% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -0.21 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched

Anti-cheat 0% · Pricing 8% · Matchmaking 0%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 32% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support -0.51 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Negative “creator made sexist comments, dismissed player anger, insincere apology” · 23 reviews
Positive “developers are actively updating the game” · 3 reviews

Stability 15% · Performance 5%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.