Codename CURE II
Codename CURE II screenshot 1Codename CURE II screenshot 2
ActionIndieFree To PlaySurvival HorrorCo-opZombiesPost-apocalypticMilitary

29 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 83

Peak in the last 7 days: 123

Codename CURE II Steam store

Game description

Codename CURE II is a co-operative first person shooter set in the aftermath of a zombie apocalypse. Create an elite military squad with up to five players and fight your way through hordes of zombies in a variety of dynamic objective missions.

Basic info

DeveloperRaptor Byte
Publisherindie.io
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckVerified
Release dateJul 24, 2026
Price

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 1200, Intel Core-i5 3570k
Memory8 GB
GraphicsGeForce GTX 950, Radeon RX 560
Storage13 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 428 reviews from the past 1 year

73.6/ 100
Bottom 30%

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 15, 2026)

177 reviewers enjoy Codename CURE II as a free co-op shooter, and a few rate it above bigger rivals, but content is thin; it scores 73.6.

👍 Strengths

The most upvoted calls this free game fun, and a few say it beats Killing Floor 3 and NMRIH2. Multiplayer appears in 44% of analyzed reviews and ranks 224th of 642: 83 enjoy playing it together, the most upvoted praising fun combat and decent maps. 21 praise the gunplay, the most upvoted saying recoil and spread improved over the first game. Others find maps highly replayable, and some say it runs well on lower end hardware. Pricing & Fairness ranks 48th of 1399, and Tech & Support ranks 148th of 1399.

👎 Where it falls short

Content Volume appears in 50% of analyzed reviews and ranks 1179th of 1351. 56 reviews want more variety in upgrades, and 56 call the launch content very limited. 25 point to dated graphics and same looking rooms, and Visuals & Sound ranks 1209th of 1249. Others say optimization falls short of the first game, and some find movement and collisions clunky. Gameplay ranks 982nd of 1396.

“better than Killing Floor 3 and NMRIH2, free to play” · 177 reviews
“fun combat and decent map design” · 83 reviews
“lacks variety in upgrades” · 56 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 50% of reviews · Bottom 30% of the games we've analyzed

Freedom -1.37 · Room to explore, build, and play your own way
Negative “cosmetics unavailable on certain characters limits customization freedom” · 8 reviews
Positive “Good map randomization design using cube-based puzzle system” · 1 review

Progression 12% · Difficulty 17% · Onboarding 7% · Strategy 19% · Controls & feel 19%

Plot, characters and the world

Not enough data — only 9% of reviews mention this.

Story -0.75 · Plot, quests, writing, and the ending

Characters 1% · World 6%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 50% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Variety -2.28 · Fresh content and situations versus repetition
Negative “lacks variety in upgrades” · 56 reviews

Volume 28% · Replayability 11%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 27% of reviews · Bottom 5% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals -0.69 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Negative “dated graphics and repetitive level design with same-looking rooms” · 25 reviews
Positive “graphics work well on lower-end devices, nostalgic fun” · 15 reviews

Audio 7%

Playing with others, the community and servers
Mentioned in 44% of reviews · Top 40% of the games we've analyzed

Playing together +2.79 · Fun of playing with friends, teammates, or rivals
Positive “fun combat and decent map design” · 83 reviews
Negative “allied NPCs stupid and annoying, need teamwork not interruption” · 6 reviews

Community 4% · Servers & Connection 2%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 33% of reviews · Top 5% of the games we've analyzed

Pricing +0.66 · Whether the price, DLC and microtransactions are reasonable, and how much paying gives you an edge
Positive “free to play with seamless multiplayer experience” · 15 reviews
Negative “DLC is very expensive for only cosmetic options” · 4 reviews

Anti-cheat 0% · Balance 12% · Matchmaking 1%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 33% of reviews · Top 20% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support +0.28 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Positive “roadmap exists and game will develop, made by two people two days ago” · 7 reviews
Negative “wants more updates and community-driven content additions” · 5 reviews

Stability 4% · Performance 15%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.