Gallipoli
Gallipoli screenshot 1Gallipoli screenshot 2
ActionIndieMassively MultiplayerSimulationStrategyWorld War IMilitaryHistoricalMultiplayerFPS

122 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 336

Peak in the last 7 days: 410

Gallipoli Steam store

Game description

Land on the beaches of Gallipoli and fight intense 50-player objective-based battles on the Ottoman Fronts! Experience WW1 trench warfare and desert expeditions as one of 10 historic classes, armed with authentic weaponry. Gallipoli brings the most immersive WW1 FPS battles yet.

Basic info

DeveloperBlackMill Games
PublisherBlackMill Games
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckUnsupported
Release dateAug 20, 2026
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10/11 64-Bit
ProcessorIntel Core i5-7400, AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Memory16 GB
GraphicsNVIDIA GTX 1660 Super, RX 5600 XT, 6GB VRAM
Storage30 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 438 reviews from the past 1 year

73.2/ 100
Bottom 30%

Steam rating: Mostly Positive (77%)

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 13, 2026)

Trench warfare that feels authentic draws players to Gallipoli, a World War I shooter that scores 73.2 from 4,827 Steam reviews.

👍 Strengths

52 reviews say the trench atmosphere feels authentic and immersive, and 59 praise its graphics, the most upvoted adding excellent Turkish voice acting. Story & World ranks 307th of 1096. 85 say they enjoy it, the most upvoted citing its AI progression and challenge, and players say movement is slow but the controls feel good, with a strategic tempo. Tech & Support ranks 493rd of 1399. Gameplay comes up in 64% of analyzed reviews.

👎 Where it falls short

Content Volume ranks 1135th of 1351. 28 reviews describe balance problems, the most upvoted citing a new class nobody plays, harsh ammunition cuts and broken medic mechanics. 24 report bugs such as players disappearing, and 21 describe stutter, desync and poor hit registration. Multiplayer ranks 449th of 642, with complaints about being killed by enemies behind corners. Some found it heavier and slower than expected.

Representative reviews Original reviews ↗

“only franchise with AI progression and challenging gameplay” · 85 reviews
“graphics successful and atmosphere well-reflected, Turkish voice acting excellent” · 59 reviews
“trench warfare atmosphere feels very authentic and immersive” · 52 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 64% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Strategy +2.04 · Depth of builds, tactics, and meaningful choices
Positive “good tempo and strategic gameplay” · 28 reviews
Negative “suppression affecting aim on hand-crank weapon is unrealistic game design” · 3 reviews

Progression 8% · Difficulty 14% · Onboarding 10% · Freedom 3% · Controls & feel 41%

Plot, characters and the world
Mentioned in 35% of reviews · Top 30% of the games we've analyzed

World +3.25 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is
Positive “trench warfare atmosphere feels very authentic and immersive” · 52 reviews
Negative “the world feels empty, no action or meaningful events” · 2 reviews

Story 1% · Characters 0%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 16% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Variety -1.51 · Fresh content and situations versus repetition
Negative “repetitive, no improvement over previous games” · 11 reviews
Positive “nice map variety and decent new mechanics” · 1 review

Volume 9% · Replayability 0%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 40% of reviews · Bottom 50% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals +2.77 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Positive “graphics successful and atmosphere well-reflected, Turkish voice acting excellent” · 59 reviews
Negative “poor smoke and shadow quality, flickering, worse than Isonzo” · 6 reviews

Audio 22%

Playing with others, the community and servers
Mentioned in 26% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Playing together +1.11 · Fun of playing with friends, teammates, or rivals
Positive “great teamwork-focused gameplay with improved movement and bots” · 10 reviews
Negative “difficulty coordinating with friends on same team requires leaving matches to regroup” · 5 reviews

Community 5% · Servers & Connection 8%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 35% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -0.43 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “new class nobody plays, ammunition cuts too severe, medic mechanics broken” · 28 reviews
Positive “guns more realistic and historically accurate, bolt actions viable unlike previous” · 9 reviews

Anti-cheat 1% · Pricing 10% · Matchmaking 4%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 35% of reviews · Top 40% of the games we've analyzed

Stability -0.27 · Crashes, freezes, save loss, and game-breaking bugs
Negative “player disappearing bugs occur regularly” · 24 reviews

Performance 17% · Developer support 16%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.