Vampire Crawlers: The Turbo Wildcard from Vampire Survivors ▶ Trailer
Vampire Crawlers: The Turbo Wildcard from Vampire Survivors screenshot 1Vampire Crawlers: The Turbo Wildcard from Vampire Survivors screenshot 2
ActionIndieStrategyCard BattlerDungeon CrawlerDeckbuildingRoguelikePixel Graphics

322 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 515

Peak in the last 7 days: 741

Vampire Crawlers: The Turbo Wildcard from Vampire Survivors Steam store

Game description

From the creators of Vampire Survivors comes a turbo-charged, turn-based roguelite deckbuilder! Deal world-ending combos, blitz through infested dungeons, and master the Turboturn to obliterate hordes of familiar foes with a chaotic hand of cards.

Basic info

Developerponcle, Nosebleed Interactive
Publisherponcle
PlatformsWindows · macOS
Steam DeckVerified
Release dateApr 21, 2026
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10 64bit
Processorx64 architecture with SSE2
Memory4 GB
GraphicsDX11, DX12 capable
Storage2 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 408 reviews from the past 1 year

86.4/ 100
Top 30%

Steam rating: Overwhelmingly Positive (96%)

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 25, 2026)

A quick, combo heavy card crawler, Vampire Crawlers: The Turbo Wildcard from Vampire Survivors scores 86.4, top 30% of games we analyzed.

👍 Strengths

188 reviews call it addictive and fun, and several joke that they cannot stop playing. 82 enjoy the deckbuilding strategy, with creative synergies and room for unconventional builds, and a few say any build feels viable. 16 praise the progression, describing a steady stream of unlocks and upgrades that makes each run more rewarding. Gameplay ranks 313th of 1396, Pricing & Fairness ranks 309th of 1399, and Tech & Support ranks 233rd of 1399.

👎 Where it falls short

42 reviews find the loop repetitive once a good combo is found, with the same builds every run and late runs that turn into a slog. 34 say the strategy is shallow, with obvious choices and turns that can be played almost without thinking, and some feel the meta upgrades remove real decisions. A few others find the pacing too fast and wish the challenge lasted longer. Some also mention a confusing way to exit the game and want a clearer view of which cards evolve together. Content Volume ranks 741st of 1351, and Visuals & Sound ranks 769th of 1249.

Representative reviews Original reviews ↗

“addictive and worth playing despite warning” · 188 reviews
“game allows creative deck-building with synergies and unconventional strategies” · 82 reviews
“ability cards reusable and sacrifice mechanics allow overpowered strategies” · 29 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 68% of reviews · Top 30% of the games we've analyzed

Strategy +2.71 · Depth of builds, tactics, and meaningful choices
Positive “game allows creative deck-building with synergies and unconventional strategies” · 82 reviews
Negative “card game requires no thinking, can spam play all button mindlessly” · 34 reviews

Progression 26% · Difficulty 17% · Onboarding 13% · Freedom 3% · Controls & feel 10%

Plot, characters and the world

Not enough data — only 6% of reviews mention this.

World +2.88 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is

Story 0% · Characters 2%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 41% of reviews · Bottom 50% of the games we've analyzed

Variety -2.06 · Fresh content and situations versus repetition
Negative “repetitive gameplay loop becomes dominant after early stages” · 42 reviews
Positive “large card pool maintains fun and variety without tedium” · 2 reviews

Volume 22% · Replayability 14%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 16% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Audio +2.91 · Music, sound effects, and voice acting
Positive “excellent sound and visual feedback creates arcade-like excitement and satisfying combo experience” · 9 reviews
Negative “chest opening animation resembles low-quality pay-to-win web game aesthetics” · 2 reviews

Visuals 10%

Playing with others, the community and servers

Not enough data — only 0% of reviews mention this.

Playing together — · Fun of playing with friends, teammates, or rivals

Community 0% · Servers & Connection 0%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 26% of reviews · Top 30% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -0.34 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “ability cards reusable and sacrifice mechanics allow overpowered strategies” · 29 reviews

Anti-cheat 0% · Pricing 13% · Matchmaking 0%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 11% of reviews · Top 20% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support +0.07 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Negative “no Turkish language support despite large Turkish player base” · 2 reviews

Stability 2% · Performance 3%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.