RACCOIN: Coin Pusher Roguelike ▶ Trailer
RACCOIN: Coin Pusher Roguelike screenshot 1RACCOIN: Coin Pusher Roguelike screenshot 2
CasualIndieSimulationStrategyRoguelikeDeckbuildingRoguelike DeckbuilderSingleplayerTurn-Based Strategy

176 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 251

RACCOIN: Coin Pusher Roguelike Steam store

Game description

A coin-pushing dopamine machine. RACCOIN is a roguelike deckbuilder where you combine special coins with powerful items to trigger wildly satisfying combos. Stack shiny towers, spin the lucky wheel, and shake the machine until all the coins drop.

Basic info

DeveloperDoraccoon
PublisherPlaystack
PlatformsWindows · macOS
Steam DeckVerified
Release dateMar 31, 2026
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10, 11
ProcessorIntel Core i5-7500, AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Memory8 GB
GraphicsNvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3gb, AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Storage1 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 424 reviews from the past 1 year

76.5/ 100
Bottom 40%

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 31, 2026)

Players call this roguelike coin pusher charming but uneven, and it scores 76.5 from 424 analyzed reviews.

👍 Strengths

143 reviews find it fun, the most upvoted pointing to some unique mechanics. 51 like its charming aesthetic and appealing concept, and Visuals & Sound ranks 614th of 1249. 42 enjoy a compelling loop with multiple viable build strategies, and Content Volume ranks 537th of 1351. Gameplay ranks 864th of 1396, and a few say it only clicks after several runs, once the playstyles open up.

👎 Where it falls short

59 reviews feel its strategy lacks depth, with decisions that carry little weight, and some note that nothing carries over between rounds. 40 call the balance off, saying a number of chips feel useless and luck decides too much. 34 say the tutorial moves too fast, and some find the starting character confusing for new players, with unlocks that are not explained. Pricing & Fairness ranks 909th of 1399, and Tech & Support ranks 825th of 1399.

“decent game with some unique and fun mechanics” · 143 reviews
“charming aesthetic and appealing concept” · 51 reviews
“unique and compelling gameplay loop with multiple viable build strategies” · 42 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 68% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Strategy +1.17 · Depth of builds, tactics, and meaningful choices
Positive “unique and compelling gameplay loop with multiple viable build strategies” · 42 reviews
Negative “strategic gameplay confined to menus, lacks weight in decisions” · 59 reviews

Progression 26% · Difficulty 17% · Onboarding 17% · Freedom 2% · Controls & feel 8%

Plot, characters and the world

Not enough data — only 5% of reviews mention this.

World +2.97 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is

Story 0% · Characters 1%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 36% of reviews · Top 40% of the games we've analyzed

Replayability +1.98 · Reasons to play again — runs, randomness, New Game+
Positive “many perks and characters to unlock, roguelike replayability” · 13 reviews
Negative “single-use coins lack satisfying powercreep and progression” · 9 reviews

Volume 12% · Variety 21%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 22% of reviews · Top 50% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals +2.96 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Positive “charming aesthetic and appealing concept” · 51 reviews

Audio 8%

Playing with others, the community and servers

Not enough data — only 1% of reviews mention this.

Playing together +3.20 · Fun of playing with friends, teammates, or rivals

Community 0% · Servers & Connection 0%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 21% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -0.44 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “balancing is wack, many chips feel useless, RNG-heavy design makes winning feel unfair” · 40 reviews

Anti-cheat 0% · Pricing 8% · Matchmaking 0%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 18% of reviews · Bottom 50% of the games we've analyzed

Stability -0.21 · Crashes, freezes, save loss, and game-breaking bugs
Negative “game crashes, be careful with crashes” · 22 reviews
Positive “auto-saves prevent progress loss from crashes” · 1 review

Performance 6% · Developer support 5%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.