Security 51 ▶ Trailer
Security 51 screenshot 1Security 51 screenshot 2
AdventureIndieSimulationPoint & ClickChoices MatterPuzzleHorrorInvestigation

14 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 33

Peak in the last 7 days: 37

Security 51 Steam store

Game description

You're a security officer deep within Area 51. Scan the staff, verify clearances, and decide who can enter the elevator and who absolutely mustn't leave. The deeper you go, the less certain you are that anyone standing before you is still human.

Basic info

DeveloperAlawar
PublisherAlawar
PlatformsWindows · macOS
Steam DeckVerified
Release dateAug 12, 2026
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10 64 bit
ProcessorIntel Core i5-6400 or analog
Memory8 GB
GraphicsAMD Radeon RX 550 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Storage2 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 362 reviews from the past 1 year

69.1/ 100
Bottom 20%

Steam rating: Mostly Positive (72%)

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 19, 2026)

A Papers, Please style checkpoint game set at Area 51, it scores 69.1 from 362 analyzed reviews.

👍 Strengths

123 reviews enjoy it, and some call it a fresh twist on the genre with plenty to do. 19 like the atmosphere and premise, a secret base with light horror and mystery. 16 praise the varied inspection tools, including x-ray scans, cameras and blood tests, which give the checks some depth. Visuals & Sound ranks 750th of 1249, and Tech & Support ranks 416th of 1399.

👎 Where it falls short

Gameplay ranks 1273rd of 1396. 34 reviews say it explains itself poorly, with unclear daily instructions, rough translations and tutorials that repeat on every branch. 33 find it too easy once you adapt, with little risk of failure. 31 call the loop repetitive, with shifts that never deepen and few meaningful decisions. Content Volume ranks 1075th of 1351, and Story & World ranks 1067th of 1096.

Representative reviews Original reviews ↗

“great twist on Papers Please, enjoying so far” · 123 reviews
“faceless NPCs with no personal stories make it feel like a meaningless simulator” · 28 reviews
“location variety and anomaly mechanics provided engaging gameplay” · 9 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 56% of reviews · Bottom 10% of the games we've analyzed

Onboarding -1.62 · How easy it is to learn — tutorials and the first hours
Negative “unskippable repetitive animations waste precious shift time” · 34 reviews
Positive “game mechanics are learnable with clear logic and always new elements” · 7 reviews

Progression 16% · Difficulty 21% · Freedom 4% · Strategy 21% · Controls & feel 7%

Plot, characters and the world
Mentioned in 44% of reviews · Bottom 5% of the games we've analyzed

Story -1.94 · Plot, quests, writing, and the ending
Negative “faceless NPCs with no personal stories make it feel like a meaningless simulator” · 28 reviews

Characters 11% · World 20%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 51% of reviews · Bottom 30% of the games we've analyzed

Variety -1.58 · Fresh content and situations versus repetition
Negative “repetitive gameplay loop that never deepens” · 31 reviews
Positive “location variety and anomaly mechanics provided engaging gameplay” · 9 reviews

Volume 17% · Replayability 17%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 29% of reviews · Bottom 50% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals +3.12 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Negative “graphics and music reused across developer's games” · 1 review

Audio 7%

Playing with others, the community and servers

Not enough data — only 1% of reviews mention this.

Community -1.82 · Who you play with — how many, and how friendly

Playing together 0% · Servers & Connection 0%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 15% of reviews · Top 50% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -0.16 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “economy is weak and does not punish, upgrades useless” · 2 reviews

Anti-cheat 0% · Pricing 10% · Matchmaking 0%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 15% of reviews · Top 30% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support +0.09 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Positive “developers respond to player feedback and released significant updates” · 7 reviews
Negative “repeated false Korean support claims, devs blame Steam, no improvement” · 1 review

Stability 6% · Performance 1%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.