Conqueror's Blade
Conqueror's Blade screenshot 1Conqueror's Blade screenshot 2
ActionMassively MultiplayerRPGStrategyFree To PlaySwordplayPvPMedievalWargameSandbox

1,739 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 3,928

Peak in the last 7 days: 5,388

Conqueror's Blade Steam store

Game description

Conqueror's Blade gives you a chance to be a true warlord. Commanding medieval troops in epic 15 vs. 15 siege battles, conquering cities with allies in the open world or fighting against players from all over the world – it's you who make the choice.

Basic info

DeveloperBooming Tech
PublisherPoros Interactive, Booming Tech
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckPlayable
Release dateApr 5, 2020
Price

Minimum specs

OSWindows 7 64-Bit
ProcessorIntel I5-6400
Memory8 GB
GraphicsNvidia Geforce GTX 1050Ti
Storage60 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 397 reviews from the past 1 year

58.0/ 100
Bottom 10%

Steam rating: Mixed (67%)

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 22, 2026)

Large medieval battles where heroes lead units are the draw, yet the game scores 58.0, held down by pricing and balance.

👍 Strengths

89 reviews find the battles fun, and some call charging into an enemy line epic and unique. 30 praise the strategic depth of choosing and leveling units, and a few say commanding troops in live combat is very satisfying. 20 enjoy playing with friends and teammates to capture objectives, and some made lasting friendships along the way. Multiplayer ranks 478th of 642.

👎 Where it falls short

Pricing & Fairness appears in 63% of analyzed reviews and ranks 1377th of 1399. 97 reviews call the balance poor, saying a handful of overpowered units dominate the meta and new ones arrive with few counters. 91 feel the pricing and grind push players toward the cash shop, and some call the progression pay to win or say cosmetics cost far too much. 34 criticize matchmaking, describing new players facing veterans with far more hours, and a few say matches are filled with bots. Gameplay ranks 1184th of 1396, and Tech & Support ranks 1213th of 1399.

Representative reviews Original reviews ↗

“white-eared unit nerfed from 10s to 3.5s invulnerability within one week” · 97 reviews
“large-scale battles are absolutely epic and unique, crashing into enemy line feels amazing” · 89 reviews
“Beautiful graphics with good gameplay” · 11 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 58% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Progression -1.74 · Leveling, unlocks and gear — is growth rewarding or a grind?
Negative “massive punishing grind, late-game is a slog, time-consuming grit” · 25 reviews
Positive “satisfying unit management and progression” · 1 review

Difficulty 4% · Onboarding 15% · Freedom 5% · Strategy 24% · Controls & feel 6%

Plot, characters and the world

Not enough data — only 7% of reviews mention this.

World +3.33 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is

Story 1% · Characters 0%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 18% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Variety -1.68 · Fresh content and situations versus repetition
Negative “repetitive gameplay loop despite weapon variety” · 6 reviews
Positive “great variety of troops from different historical epochs” · 2 reviews

Volume 7% · Replayability 1%

Graphics, art style, music and sound

Not enough data — only 8% of reviews mention this.

Visuals +1.81 · Graphics, art style, and animation

Audio 1%

Playing with others, the community and servers
Mentioned in 34% of reviews · Bottom 30% of the games we've analyzed

Community -2.23 · Who you play with — how many, and how friendly
Negative “weak advertising and small online player base” · 4 reviews

Playing together 19% · Servers & Connection 6%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 63% of reviews · Bottom 5% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -1.36 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “white-eared unit nerfed from 10s to 3.5s invulnerability within one week” · 97 reviews

Anti-cheat 2% · Pricing 43% · Matchmaking 20%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 33% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support -0.64 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Negative “new banning system unfair; support unhelpful and unresponsive to appeals” · 20 reviews
Positive “recent updates and Three Kingdoms season show dev commitment to improvement” · 3 reviews

Stability 6% · Performance 7%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.