The Quinfall
The Quinfall screenshot 1The Quinfall screenshot 2
Massively MultiplayerOpen WorldMMORPGRPGCharacter CustomizationMultiplayer

277 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 400

Peak in the last 7 days: 439

The Quinfall Steam store

Game description

Embark on an adventurous journey to explore the Quinfall universe. Be a part of unique battles and an immersive story with dozens of different professions in the depths of medieval times in an all-new MMORPG experience.

Basic info

DeveloperVawraek Technology Inc.
PublisherVawraek Technology Inc.
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckPlayable
Release dateFeb 6, 2026
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows® 10 64-bit
ProcessorIntel® Core™ i3-4160 / AMD CPU with 4 physical cores @ 3Ghz
Memory8 GB
GraphicsNVIDIA® GeForce® GT 760 2GB / AMD Radeon R9 270X
Storage55 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 380 reviews from the past 1 year

54.8/ 100
Bottom 5%

Steam rating: Mixed (51%)

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 25, 2026)

A low cost sandbox MMO with a huge world, The Quinfall lands at 54.8 from 380 reviews, with heavy monetization weighing on its content.

👍 Strengths

66 reviews still enjoy it, finding the combat fun and the many systems worth a look despite the issues. 26 credit developer support, describing frequent updates, quick patches and a team that answers technical problems fast. 25 praise the amount of content, with quests, professions, farming, dungeons and bosses to fill hundreds of hours. Content Volume ranks 635th of 1351, and Multiplayer ranks 564th of 642.

👎 Where it falls short

Pricing & Fairness ranks 1280th of 1399 and comes up in 56% of analyzed reviews. 55 reviews call the monetization pay to win, with gacha wheels, paywalled slots and gear that requires spending to compete in endgame PvP. 45 criticize how the developers handle the community, citing strict moderation, ignored feedback and slow fixes. 44 report poor performance and optimization, with frame drops during world bosses and open world events. Tech & Support ranks 1306th of 1399, Visuals & Sound ranks 1241st of 1249, and Gameplay ranks 1221st of 1396.

Representative reviews Original reviews ↗

“combat system was fun and enjoyable despite issues” · 66 reviews
“no class balance, broken economy, poor optimization” · 28 reviews
“developer team responded almost instantly to technical support request with detailed help” · 26 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 61% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Controls & feel -2.24 · Responsiveness, precision, and how the menus handle
Negative “combat feels awful after the update” · 25 reviews
Positive “dynamic, entertaining combat with good rhythm and timing” · 4 reviews

Progression 35% · Difficulty 5% · Onboarding 13% · Freedom 15% · Strategy 17%

Plot, characters and the world
Mentioned in 14% of reviews · Bottom 5% of the games we've analyzed

Story -1.85 · Plot, quests, writing, and the ending

Characters 2% · World 9%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 38% of reviews · Top 50% of the games we've analyzed

Volume +1.61 · How much there is to play, including endgame, for the price
Positive “hundreds of hours of gameplay with quests, story, professions, farming, dungeons” · 25 reviews
Negative “zero PvE content, only mob farming and PvP; no raids, dungeons, or side quests” · 3 reviews

Variety 20% · Replayability 1%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 25% of reviews · Bottom 1% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals -1.33 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Negative “graphics look like early 2000s, RAM leaks rampant, no FSR/DLSS support” · 16 reviews
Positive “bones are very good with lots of potential” · 9 reviews

Audio 4%

Playing with others, the community and servers
Mentioned in 42% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Community -2.09 · Who you play with — how many, and how friendly
Negative “no players during playtime, dead game” · 9 reviews

Playing together 21% · Servers & Connection 5%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 56% of reviews · Bottom 10% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -0.91 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “no class balance, broken economy, poor optimization” · 28 reviews

Anti-cheat 8% · Pricing 40% · Matchmaking 4%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 68% of reviews · Bottom 10% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support -0.45 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Negative “permanent ban for discussing pay-to-win mechanics, no warning or transparency” · 45 reviews
Positive “developer team responded almost instantly to technical support request with detailed help” · 26 reviews

Stability 17% · Performance 28%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.