SPAM ▶ Trailer
SPAM screenshot 1SPAM screenshot 2
RPGStrategyFree To PlayPvPTurn-Based CombatCompetitiveMultiplayerCard Battler

459 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 2,471

Peak in the last 7 days: 2,561

SPAM Steam store

Game description

SPAM is a free-to-play online turn-based combat game. Jump into dynamic battles where you’ll have to adapt to your opponents and try to impose your strategy. Earn new cards through your victories and create devastating combos!!

Basic info

DeveloperTicroco Entreprise
PublisherTicroco Entreprise
PlatformsWindows · Linux
Release dateOct 7, 2026
Price

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10 64-bit (21H1 or later)
ProcessorDual core 2 GHz, 64-bit
Memory4 GB
GraphicsDirectX 11 compatible, 2 GB VRAM
Storage4 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 455 reviews from the past 1 year

78.4/ 100
Bottom 50%

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 14, 2026)

119 reviews find SPAM fun and addictive, but card prices draw the top complaint; it scores 78.4.

👍 Strengths

Gameplay ranks 467th of 1396 and appears in 78% of analyzed reviews. 119 reviews praise the fun, smooth play, sound and strategy. 104 say the talent system brings real variety to playstyles, and 70 admire art in many different styles. Visuals & Sound ranks 317th of 1249. Others like that it is free with no pay to win and an affordable battle pass, and some credit developers who fix bugs often.

👎 Where it falls short

Pricing & Fairness comes up in 63% of analyzed reviewsand ranks 801st of 1399. 99 reviews criticize the monetization, the most upvoted calling progression grindy and predatory. 60 describe balance that leans on luck, with certain cards and the draft dominating matches. 25 say the tutorial leaves parts of the game unexplained. Others estimate a thousand hours to collect every card. Tech & Support ranks 122nd of 1399.

“Game is incredible, addictive, fast-paced with simple engaging gameplay” · 119 reviews
“talent system brings diversity and playstyle variety” · 104 reviews
“art is incredibly well done with diverse styles and aesthetics” · 70 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 78% of reviews · Top 40% of the games we've analyzed

Strategy +2.86 · Depth of builds, tactics, and meaningful choices
Positive “talent system brings diversity and playstyle variety” · 104 reviews
Negative “too much RNG, limited strategic possibilities, concept itself is flawed” · 8 reviews

Progression 41% · Difficulty 5% · Onboarding 22% · Freedom 1% · Controls & feel 5%

Plot, characters and the world

Not enough data — only 1% of reviews mention this.

World +1.57 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is

Story 0% · Characters 0%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 15% of reviews · Top 50% of the games we've analyzed

Variety -0.85 · Fresh content and situations versus repetition
Negative “only 4 maps creates repetition and limits strategic depth” · 6 reviews
Positive “great variety of combinations, all fun to try” · 3 reviews

Volume 4% · Replayability 2%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 30% of reviews · Top 30% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals +3.57 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Positive “art is incredibly well done with diverse styles and aesthetics” · 70 reviews

Audio 5%

Playing with others, the community and servers

Not enough data — only 4% of reviews mention this.

Playing together +2.48 · Fun of playing with friends, teammates, or rivals

Community 2% · Servers & Connection 0%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 63% of reviews · Bottom 50% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -0.70 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “RNG-heavy balance with broken Tox cards and unfair draft mechanics dominate matches” · 60 reviews
Positive “well balanced, can win in competitive with common cards” · 7 reviews

Anti-cheat 0% · Pricing 55% · Matchmaking 7%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 16% of reviews · Top 10% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support +0.22 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Positive “developers responsive to feedback with frequent bug fixes and balance updates” · 15 reviews
Negative “lack of communication for players not following Discord or YouTube” · 1 review

Stability 2% · Performance 2%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.