CloverPit ▶ Trailer
CloverPit screenshot 1CloverPit screenshot 2
ActionAdventureIndieSimulationSportsStrategyGamblingRoguelikeRoguelitePsychological HorrorFirst-Person

641 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 1,005

Peak in the last 7 days: 1,198

CloverPit Steam store

Game description

A rogue-lite slot machine nightmare. Gamble for your life in a never-ending debt simulator!

Basic info

DeveloperPanik Arcade
PublisherFuture Friends Games
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckVerified
Release dateSep 26, 2025
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10 or more
ProcessorIntel i3 4th generation or equivalent
Memory1 GB
GraphicsMost dedicated GPUs should work.
Storage512 MB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 370 reviews from the past 1 year

79.8/ 100
Bottom 50%

Steam rating: Very Positive (90%)

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 25, 2026)

A slot machine roguelike about paying off a growing debt, CloverPit scores 79.8 across 370 analyzed reviews.

👍 Strengths

167 reviews call it addictive and thrilling, and some keep chasing every achievement. 46 praise its strategic depth, the most upvoted describing nuanced metas and great gameplay depth. 18 like the visuals, calling the graphics good and the art style accessible. Story & World ranks 504th of 1096, and Content Volume ranks 557th of 1351. Gameplay appears in 58% of analyzed reviews.

👎 Where it falls short

37 reviews complain about balance, saying patches nerfed strong charms and items without clear reasons, and some feel the debt on harder modes becomes impossible to beat. 33 find runs repetitive, with too many dull items and the same builds returning, and a few say it leans heavily on luck. 26 say unlocking more items makes progress harder because weak picks dilute the pool, and some find early runs too dependent on luck. Pricing & Fairness ranks 1030th of 1399, and Tech & Support ranks 715th of 1399.

Representative reviews Original reviews ↗

“addicting and thrilling game, 66.6 hours with 100% achievements” · 167 reviews
“nuanced metas with great gameplay depth” · 46 reviews
“Good graphics with accessible art style” · 18 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 58% of reviews · Top 50% of the games we've analyzed

Strategy +2.76 · Depth of builds, tactics, and meaningful choices
Positive “nuanced metas with great gameplay depth” · 46 reviews
Negative “lacks meaningful choices; most outcomes determined by random chance rather than strategy” · 14 reviews

Progression 32% · Difficulty 19% · Onboarding 7% · Freedom 1% · Controls & feel 5%

Plot, characters and the world
Mentioned in 19% of reviews · Top 50% of the games we've analyzed

World +3.00 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is
Positive “concept and atmosphere are great” · 10 reviews

Story 5% · Characters 1%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 41% of reviews · Top 50% of the games we've analyzed

Replayability +2.12 · Reasons to play again — runs, randomness, New Game+
Positive “getting game-breaking level builds is awesome” · 14 reviews
Negative “roguelike lacks satisfying progression; unlocking items makes specific drops rarer” · 14 reviews

Volume 12% · Variety 19%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 19% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals +2.87 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Positive “Good graphics with accessible art style” · 18 reviews
Negative “not epilepsy-friendly due to rapid screen flashing effects” · 2 reviews

Audio 10%

Playing with others, the community and servers

Not enough data — only 1% of reviews mention this.

Community -2.33 · Who you play with — how many, and how friendly

Playing together 0% · Servers & Connection 0%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 24% of reviews · Bottom 30% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -0.27 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “dev nerfed powerful items without clear reasoning” · 37 reviews
Positive “excellent balance between casual accessibility and strategic depth with rerolls” · 1 review

Anti-cheat 0% · Pricing 16% · Matchmaking 0%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 14% of reviews · Bottom 50% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support -0.16 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Negative “devs changed achievement requirements, disrespectful toward players” · 17 reviews
Positive “developers update frequently and balance the game thoughtfully” · 2 reviews

Stability 4% · Performance 3%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.