Scarlet Skips ▶ Trailer
Scarlet Skips screenshot 1Scarlet Skips screenshot 2
ActionFemale ProtagonistFunnyCartoonSexual ContentCute

Playing nowFewer than 10

Peak in the last 24 hours: 23

Peak in the last 7 days: 29

Scarlet Skips Steam store

Game description

Jump jump jump as much as you can in this silly 1-button Rogue-Like about skipping rope! Power up your jump ropes to help Scarlet jump higher, survive longer, and reach absurdly high scores! boing boing boing boing boing boing boing boing

Basic info

DeveloperYerk Games
PublisherYerk Games
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckVerified
Release dateSep 3, 2026
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10
ProcessorIntel i7-6700HQ
Memory8 GB
GraphicsNVIDIA GTX 1060
Storage2 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 381 reviews from the past 1 year

75.2/ 100
Bottom 40%

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 15, 2026)

Charming and fun for 192 reviewers, Scarlet Skips is an incremental roguelike with clever exploits but little content; it scores 75.2.

👍 Strengths

192 reviews call it fun and enjoyable overall. 85 find it charming with impressive detail and a cute ending, and Visuals & Sound ranks 654th of 1249. 19 enjoy its strategic depth, with exploits and synergies that break the rules. Others find the challenge satisfying after several attempts, and some say it delivers better than pricier games. Pricing & Fairness ranks 147th of 1399.

👎 Where it falls short

Content Volume appears in 45% of analyzed reviews and ranks 1251st of 1351. 63 reviews say there is too little content and only one achievement. 29 report poor optimization that overheats their machines even on low settings. 21 call it extremely repetitive with no extra stages or rewards. Others wanted more challenge, and some see no reason to replay after one win. Tech & Support ranks 1027th of 1399, and Gameplay ranks 977th of 1396.

“fun and enjoyable game overall” · 192 reviews
“charming with impressive detail for a simple game loop, cute ending” · 85 reviews
“too little content; only one achievement for a progression-focused game feels incomplete” · 63 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 51% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Strategy +0.63 · Depth of builds, tactics, and meaningful choices
Positive “incremental nature with exploits and synergies, roguelike system breaking mechanics” · 19 reviews
Negative “game can break relatively easily, ranking full of max score exploiters” · 5 reviews

Progression 15% · Difficulty 17% · Onboarding 7% · Freedom 2% · Controls & feel 9%

Plot, characters and the world
Mentioned in 18% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Characters +1.60 · How memorable the characters and their relationships are
Positive “likes the character and gameplay concept” · 2 reviews
Negative “character lacks expected personality and animation” · 2 reviews

Story 6% · World 4%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 45% of reviews · Bottom 10% of the games we've analyzed

Volume -2.43 · How much there is to play, including endgame, for the price
Negative “too little content; only one achievement for a progression-focused game feels incomplete” · 63 reviews

Variety 13% · Replayability 15%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 40% of reviews · Bottom 50% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals +3.20 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Positive “charming with impressive detail for a simple game loop, cute ending” · 85 reviews
Negative “rope clips through floor, mouth clips into lip, text hovers out of sync” · 2 reviews

Audio 8%

Playing with others, the community and servers

Not enough data — only 2% of reviews mention this.

Playing together +3.25 · Fun of playing with friends, teammates, or rivals

Community 0% · Servers & Connection 0%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 21% of reviews · Top 20% of the games we've analyzed

Pricing +0.24 · Whether the price, DLC and microtransactions are reasonable, and how much paying gives you an edge
Positive “delivers on its promise better than more expensive games” · 7 reviews
Negative “$4.99 is excessive for two hours of content, $2.99 would be fair” · 5 reviews

Anti-cheat 2% · Balance 2% · Matchmaking 0%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 24% of reviews · Bottom 30% of the games we've analyzed

Performance -0.31 · Frame rate, optimization, and loading times
Negative “poor optimization causes overheating even on low settings” · 29 reviews

Stability 6% · Developer support 11%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.