KARDS - The WW2 Card Game ▶ Trailer
KARDS - The WW2 Card Game screenshot 1KARDS - The WW2 Card Game screenshot 2
CasualIndieStrategyFree To PlayCard GameWorld War IITrading Card GameWargamePvP

2,873 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 4,453

Peak in the last 7 days: 7,317

KARDS - The WW2 Card Game Steam store

Game description

KARDS, The World War II Card Game, combines traditional CCG gameplay with innovative mechanics inspired by classic strategy games and real battlefield tactics. Take command and challenge other players in grand-scale warfare on the ground, air, or seas.

Basic info

Developer1939 Games
Publisher1939 Games
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckUnsupported
Release dateApr 15, 2020
Price

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10 64-bit
ProcessorCore i3-3225 3.3 GHz
Memory8 GB
GraphicsIntel HD 4000 on PC; AMD Radeon Vega 8
Storage5 GB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 409 reviews from the past 1 year

49.2/ 100
Bottom 5%

Steam rating: Mixed (68%)

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 21, 2026)

Its World War Two theme and card art win fans, but this card battler scores 49.2 as balance and pricing draw heavy criticism.

👍 Strengths

66 reviews say it is fun and addictive, with some admitting they cannot stop playing despite the frustration. 26 praise the art style and sound design, and some like how well the cards fit the wartime theme. Visuals & Sound ranks 791st of 1249, and Story & World ranks 701st of 1096. 13 enjoy the strategic depth of card synergies, unit counters and the front line system, and a few mention many viable builds.

👎 Where it falls short

Pricing & Fairness appears in 76% of analyzed reviews and ranks 1391st of 1399. 139 reviews say the balance has been broken by power creep, with overpowered cards that dominate the meta and leave older decks unplayable. 96 call the card packs expensive or describe pricing as pay to win, and some say the rewards have been cut over time. 41 report server lag, crashes and disconnects that can cost ranked games. Gameplay ranks 1316th of 1396, Multiplayer ranks 633rd of 642, and Tech & Support ranks 1220th of 1399.

Representative reviews Original reviews ↗

“balance destroyed by power creep, old decks unplayable, meta dominated by broken cards” · 139 reviews
“new players struggle with progression and game quality cannot retain players” · 10 reviews
“community is extremely toxic with no moderation or report system” · 8 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 45% of reviews · Bottom 10% of the games we've analyzed

Progression -1.97 · Leveling, unlocks and gear — is growth rewarding or a grind?
Negative “high grind requirement for progression” · 6 reviews
Positive “fast card collection, reached rank quickly without spending” · 1 review

Difficulty 2% · Onboarding 14% · Freedom 1% · Strategy 20% · Controls & feel 2%

Plot, characters and the world
Mentioned in 14% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

World +2.33 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is
Positive “front-line mechanic creates immersive war atmosphere” · 11 reviews
Negative “game no longer feels like WWII, shifted to high-tech high-magic warfare” · 1 review

Story 2% · Characters 0%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value

Not enough data — only 8% of reviews mention this.

Variety -3.20 · Fresh content and situations versus repetition

Volume 2% · Replayability 0%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 16% of reviews · Bottom 40% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals +2.43 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Positive “art direction is strong, vintage style really liked” · 26 reviews
Negative “new gold card has cheap plastic appearance” · 2 reviews

Audio 3%

Playing with others, the community and servers
Mentioned in 30% of reviews · Bottom 5% of the games we've analyzed

Community -2.15 · Who you play with — how many, and how friendly
Negative “community is extremely toxic with no moderation or report system” · 8 reviews

Playing together 4% · Servers & Connection 18%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 76% of reviews · Bottom 1% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -1.97 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “balance destroyed by power creep, old decks unplayable, meta dominated by broken cards” · 139 reviews
Positive “excellent ELO ranking system” · 5 reviews

Anti-cheat 11% · Pricing 48% · Matchmaking 16%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 35% of reviews · Bottom 20% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support -0.73 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Negative “new players struggle with progression and game quality cannot retain players” · 10 reviews
Positive “developers increasingly listen to community feedback and balance updates” · 2 reviews

Stability 8% · Performance 4%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.