Batomon Showdown ▶ Trailer
Batomon Showdown screenshot 1Batomon Showdown screenshot 2
CasualIndieStrategyAuto BattlerCreature CollectorAsynchronous MultiplayerDeckbuildingRoguelike

801 playing

Peak in the last 24 hours: 1,355

Peak in the last 7 days: 1,708

Batomon Showdown Steam store

Game description

Creature-collecting pvp async auto battler where you choose your trainer, select your Batomon and assemble the ultimate team to take down other players! Play at your own pace while you discover new deadly team combos and synergies! Break the game by training your Batomon to overpowered levels.

Basic info

Developerberrymint
Publisherberrymint
PlatformsWindows
Steam DeckPlayable
Release dateSep 15, 2026
Price

Prices by IsThereAnyDeal

Minimum specs

OSWindows 10
ProcessorDual Core 2 GHz
Memory2 MB
Graphics1 GB RAM
Storage512 MB
steamyze

Review Analysis Score

Based on 455 reviews from the past 1 year

86.2/ 100
Top 30%

Steam rating: Very Positive (91%)

Review analysis summary (Reviewed Oct 14, 2026)

230 reviews call Batomon Showdown a very fun monster battler, and some see a loving homage to Pokemon; it scores 86.2.

👍 Strengths

Gameplay ranks 106th of 1396. The most upvoted praises the gameplay and its nod to Pokemon. 87 reviews enjoy planning team compositions. 29 like the cute pixel and anime art and iconic monster designs. Others say random elements and varied builds make every run different, and some credit developers who keep adding monsters, items and trainers. Tech & Support ranks 70th of 1399.

👎 Where it falls short

Balance draws the most criticism. 81 reviews raise balance issues, the most upvoted citing standout team compositions and cooldown reduction effects. 27 want more content, the most upvoted citing limited event variety, and 21 say winning runs end with the same three teams again and again. Some report broken matchmaking at high ranks, and a few dislike a survival mode that rewards one hit kills. Pricing & Fairness ranks 998th of 1399, and Content Volume ranks 560th of 1351.

Representative reviews Original reviews ↗

“very fun with great gameplay and homage to pokemon” · 230 reviews
“fun game with potential for cool team comps” · 87 reviews
“pixel/anime art style cute, iconic monster design” · 29 reviews

How it holds up

−50+5

Controls, difficulty, progression and depth
Mentioned in 50% of reviews · Top 10% of the games we've analyzed

Strategy +2.97 · Depth of builds, tactics, and meaningful choices
Positive “fun game with potential for cool team comps” · 87 reviews
Negative “dividing areas reduces strategy depth to half, feels like demo replay” · 6 reviews

Progression 4% · Difficulty 4% · Onboarding 9% · Freedom 1% · Controls & feel 4%

Plot, characters and the world

Not enough data — only 5% of reviews mention this.

World +2.77 · Lore, atmosphere, and how immersive the setting is

Story 0% · Characters 2%

How much there is to do, variety and replay value
Mentioned in 32% of reviews · Top 50% of the games we've analyzed

Replayability +3.00 · Reasons to play again — runs, randomness, New Game+
Positive “random elements and varied builds make every run different” · 19 reviews
Negative “too much variance limits longevity, not suitable as daily habit long-term” · 2 reviews

Volume 19% · Variety 11%

Graphics, art style, music and sound
Mentioned in 15% of reviews · Top 50% of the games we've analyzed

Visuals +3.29 · Graphics, art style, and animation
Positive “pixel/anime art style cute, iconic monster design” · 29 reviews
Negative “graphical improvements needed for attack animations” · 1 review

Audio 5%

Playing with others, the community and servers

Not enough data — only 4% of reviews mention this.

Playing together +1.71 · Fun of playing with friends, teammates, or rivals

Community 1% · Servers & Connection 0%

Pricing, cheaters, balance and matchmaking
Mentioned in 38% of reviews · Bottom 30% of the games we've analyzed

Balance -0.43 · Whether classes, weapons, and builds are evenly matched
Negative “standout comps and cooldown reduction create balance issues” · 81 reviews
Positive “excellent balance design, diverse viable builds and counterplay options” · 9 reviews

Anti-cheat 0% · Pricing 9% · Matchmaking 5%

Bugs, performance and developer support
Mentioned in 17% of reviews · Top 10% of the games we've analyzed

Developer support +0.39 · Updates, patches, and how devs respond to players
Positive “devs added new content, Batomons, items and trainers post-launch” · 14 reviews
Negative “分成两个地区不共通，大失所望” · 1 review

Stability 1% · Performance 1%

Grey means too few reviews mention it to trust. — means almost no reviews mention it.

Was this analysis useful? Sign in with Steam to vote

🎲 What kind of gamer are you? Find your title in 3 minutes.